Trump’s Gaza Proposal Faces Strong Backlash Amid Historical and Legal Concerns

Many Gazans are descendants of those who fled or were driven from their homes in 1948, during the creation of the state of Israel—a period known to Palestinians as the Nakba, or "catastrophe." For many, the thought of enduring another forced displacement is deeply painful, and they will likely hold onto what remains of Gaza with fierce determination.

For those Palestinians who dream of a state of their own alongside Israel, Trump's suggestion that they permanently leave Gaza is seen as a significant blow. The loss of Gaza, a land they consider part of their heritage, would feel like a severance from their identity.

Since 1948, Gaza has been physically separated from the West Bank, and while previous peace proposals, including Trump's 2020 "Vision for Peace," suggested ways to link the two regions through tunnels or railways, Trump's latest remarks appear to ask Palestinians to give up Gaza once and for all.

Although he does not seem to advocate for forced deportation, which is a violation of international law, Trump's proposal clearly encourages Palestinians to leave Gaza voluntarily. Palestinian officials have already accused Israel of blocking the supply of caravans that could help displaced Gazans find shelter in less damaged parts of the territory while reconstruction efforts unfold.

Arab nations, including Egypt and Jordan, which Trump suggests should absorb up to 1.8 million Gazan refugees, have strongly rejected the proposal. Both countries are already grappling with their own significant challenges and view this potential burden as untenable.

Current Status of Gaza and Trump’s Proposal

Gaza, which was occupied by Egypt for 19 years before being seized by Israel in the 1967 Six-Day War, is still considered occupied by Israel under international law, though Israel disputes this. Israel claims the occupation ended in 2005 when it unilaterally dismantled Jewish settlements and withdrew its military. The United Nations recognizes Gaza as part of a sovereign Palestinian state, but the U.S. does not. Gaza is physically isolated from the outside world by fences and an Israeli maritime blockade, leading many to see it as a non-independent, isolated area.

Trump's comments about potentially taking over Gaza, though provocative, lack a legal basis. The U.S. has no territorial claim to Gaza, and it’s unclear how Trump intends to impose American rule. His remarks may either be an exaggerated negotiating tactic or an opening in broader discussions about Gaza's future.

While international plans have been proposed for Gaza's governance post-conflict, including a temporary administration by the U.S., UAE, and Israel, any form of U.S. takeover would likely require military intervention, something Trump has generally sought to avoid. Current American involvement in Gaza is limited to security firms managing checkpoints, not a full-scale occupation.

Trump's comments may complicate negotiations for a long-term ceasefire between Israel and Hamas. If Hamas perceives the end goal as a depopulated Gaza, it could endanger the peace process, potentially halting further negotiations.

Trump’s Remarks on the West Bank

Regarding Israeli sovereignty over the West Bank, Trump has indicated he has yet to take a position but promised an announcement in the coming weeks. This has raised concerns among Palestinians, as any U.S. recognition of Israeli sovereignty over the West Bank would severely undermine the two-state solution. Most of the international community views Israeli settlements in the West Bank as illegal under international law, though Israel disputes this claim. Trump's previous peace efforts, like the Abraham Accords, have already altered the diplomatic landscape, and his potential stance on the West Bank could have significant repercussions for future peace talks.

References